We’re not sustainability experts, but we do think and care about our environmental footprint and ethics in our business choices. We use exclusively full grain vegetable-tanned cowhide in our business, and we believe this is the most sustainable choice.
In this post we’ll discuss why we believe this is a sustainable choice, and explore what other sustainability considerations customers have with leather.
Leather source ethics: animal and alternatives
When choosing the source of leather (animal, vegetable, plastic), there are several ethical considerations.
As a first, obvious ethical (and legal) choice, any leather from endangered animal species should be avoided at all costs. A list of thousands of animal and plant species are listed by the Washington Convention on the Protection of Animals (CITES – Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of wild fauna and flora), an international agreement between 164 countries. The aim of the agreement, signed by eighty governments in Washington in 1973, is the protection of endangered species from extinction. This should be relatively easy to do since it is illegal!
Secondly, we choose not to use leather from animals that were raised just for that leather. This includes some “exotic leathers” such as snake or alligator where the hide is more valuable than the meat (see Lesson #2).
So, while we’re not vegetarians or vegans, at Walnut we use animal hides that are a byproduct of the meat industry. “Byproduct” means that even a high quality hide represents 5% or less of the value of the animal. We consider it a measure of respect to use the whole animal, including the hide.
Some argue that leather sales subsidize meat prices, but according to the tannery we spoke with, in practice at this point, the vast consumption of meat far outweighs the demand for leather. As evidence, the tannery pointed to the fact that the price of hides has both doubled and halved over the years, with no change in the number of cattle grown or the supply of hides. In other words, if the hides were not used for leather, they would be landfilled.
For those that do not agree with this choice, the other options for a leather alternative include plastic and vegetable fiber leathers, which are discussed further in our post about kinds of leathers (Lesson #2). Vegetable fiber leathers are not a working solution for our workshop – at this point – because they don’t have the same combination of structural rigidity and flexibility and are still in the R&D phase.
Many organizations recommend using faux leathers made out of plastics rather than animals for animal welfare considerations. This is a personal, moral choice for each individual, but at Walnut we don’t use faux leathers for two reasons:
- Faux leathers don’t have the same rigid structure as the full grain vegetable-tanned leather we use. Faux leathers (and mineral-tanned leathers) are more like fabrics that drape, whereas our products need a leather with a unique combination of structural rigidity and flexibility.
- Faux leathers are a product made from petroleum, a non-renewable resource, that does not biodegrade and has its own ethical considerations for the environment.
Environmental footprint of tanning
We care about our environmental footprint for the sake of all animals (including humans), and this is one major reason why we choose to work with vegetable-tanned leather.
Natural, old-fashioned vegetable-tanned leather has a low environmental footprint: it uses natural, biodegradable and ancient substances in the tanning process, and as a result the leather itself is also the most biodegradable among leathers when finished.
Mineral-tanned leathers use salts and metals in tanning, which creates wastewater pollution problems.
Where leather is tanned makes a big difference in environmental impact. Not only does leather tanned outside the country require more oil and gas for shipping back and forth (in many cases, the hides are sent from the US to developing countries for tanning, and then sent back to the US as tanned hides) – but in those developing countries, one of the reasons the tanning is cheaper is because they have less environmental laws, allowing them to pollute more at lower cost. (They also have lower labor costs, which may challenge the ethics of social justice as well.)
Some have argued that bonded leather is “good” for the environment because it makes use of all of the leather, even its production waste product, dust. But turning leather dust into fabric requires adding a bunch of toxic glues and polymers, and creates a poor-quality, limited-lifespan product.
Plastic leathers are inexpensive and the alternative of choice for animal rights concerns. However, they are one of the least environmentally sustainable choices for leather.
Vegetable leathers, like mushroom leather or pineapple fiber leather, show real promise but are still in the development stage.
Product lifecycle / landfills
One of the easiest environmental choices a customer can make is to choose to buy durable, repairable, long-lasting goods with a long lifecycle.
Vegetable-tanned leather gets more beautiful with use and age and lasts as long as you take care of it, but once you throw it away, it starts to biodegrade. Meanwhile mineral-tanned, garment, bonded, and plastic leathers have a shorter useful life.
Companies that care
There are many other daily, small choices that people at companies have to make, whether it’s noticed or not. It’s important to choose to buy products from companies and brands that you trust to share your sustainability and ethical values.
Consumer choice can have unimaginable ripple effects – just look at all the good a company like Patagonia can do with a strong and dedicated customer base, from national park advocacy to sustainable food marketing.
Leather certification programs
- There is no such thing as “organic leather.” There is no tracking program for organically-raised beef hides, nor separation of organic and non-organic hides in the tanneries. The only way to support organically-raised agriculture is to buy organic food.
- When considering exotic leathers, avoid endangered species – only purchase if it has a CITES certificate (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of wild fauna and flora).
- The Leather Working Group is a stakeholder group of brands, manufacturers, suppliers, NGOs and end users working together to improve the environmental impacts of leather – in practice, they are focused on mineral- or chrome-tanned leathers, like garment leather, because vegetable-tanned leathers don’t present a significant problem and aren’t used that much in the big textile industry (90% of leather tanned worldwide is mineral-tanned). The group is led by fashion and footwear brands, like Nike. The Leather Working Group sets minimum standards for members, so theoretically one could check to see if a particular tannery is on this list… if it is in the tannery’s interest to do so, because like LEED certification, the process is onerous and expensive. If a tannery’s customers aren’t demanding it, they are unlikely to volunteer for it.
We take our commitment to sustainability seriously and lay it out transparently in our Sustainability Declaration.
But what happens when you’re out in the wild, in a store or shopping online? How can you tell what kind of leather a product is made of, or if it’s any good?
In the next post, we’ll share tips and tricks for spotting craftsmanship details and leather quality out in the wild.
We’re writing a leather learning series, and this is the eighth of eleven posts. In the series, we go through the different kinds of leather and the different ways it is tanned and finished, then talk about how leather as a raw material is turned into products, how to tell good leather products in the store, how those products should be maintained, and what ethical leather choices are.
Subscribe to our email list to get notified of more posts like these: